=== RUN 2026-06-24T16:57:24-05:00 ===
===== Replaying last codex prompt through shim, capturing RAW output =====
exit=0
----- stdout size -----
784 /tmp/cj/codex-raw.txt
----- stderr size -----
20434 /tmp/cj/codex-raw.err
----- first 80 lines of stdout -----
{"summary":"No blocking issues found. [suggestion] One wording tweak would avoid implying that non-Linear task surfaces receive automatic wrapper streaming.","comments":[{"path":"packages/coding-agent/examples/extensions/subagent/agents/worker.md","line":22,"body":"[suggestion] This now says the wrapper automatically streams to the active task surface, but the surrounding docs only describe automatic streaming for the Linear-backed wrapper. For GitHub issues, PRs, or direct user threads, this could imply integration behavior that does not exist. Consider narrowing this to something like: \"When the Linear-backed wrapper is enabled, it automatically streams... Otherwise, include status in the originating PR/thread handoff.\""}],"verdict":"approve","workflow_suggestions":[]}
----- last 40 lines of stdout -----
{"summary":"No blocking issues found. [suggestion] One wording tweak would avoid implying that non-Linear task surfaces receive automatic wrapper streaming.","comments":[{"path":"packages/coding-agent/examples/extensions/subagent/agents/worker.md","line":22,"body":"[suggestion] This now says the wrapper automatically streams to the active task surface, but the surrounding docs only describe automatic streaming for the Linear-backed wrapper. For GitHub issues, PRs, or direct user threads, this could imply integration behavior that does not exist. Consider narrowing this to something like: \"When the Linear-backed wrapper is enabled, it automatically streams... Otherwise, include status in the originating PR/thread handoff.\""}],"verdict":"approve","workflow_suggestions":[]}
=== EXIT 0 ===